Hey George Book a demo

How it works

Counsel speaks. The record builds itself underneath.

Three layers: capture that never waits, a structured record of the matter, and an agent that works against that record rather than the recording. You never see the structure — you see one screen.

The three layers

Capture is fast because the thinking happens somewhere else

Capture

Audio streams in chunks and never waits for the hearing to end. A second pass labels who is speaking, tuned for SA citation formats, Latin and court nomenclature: English, isiZulu, Afrikaans and seSotho, including counsel switching mid-sentence.

The record

Issues, facts, authorities, documents, events and obligations, with issues as the spine. A matter is a set of contested issues, each carrying a state: pleaded, argued, conceded, decided or abandoned.

The agent

The agent runs against the record and never against the raw audio, which is what keeps the live panel quick while it thinks. Retrieval over case law, contradiction checks, drafting. It proposes; it never commits.

Why contradictions come free

A fact knows who asserted it, and when

A fact knows who asserted it, who disputes it, and the page it sits on.

The same fact, asserted one way in the papers and another way from the bar, is a query over the record. So a contradiction is not a clever trick — the shape of the record is what surfaces it, rather than a guess.

The difference between the file before court and the file after it is the hearing note, and nobody types it.

One fact, four sources

Delivery was effected on 2 August 2020

Asserted — founding affidavit ¶ 44, p 17

Relied on — from the bar, today 10:39

Contradicted — from the bar, today 10:41

Contradicted — by the client, today 11:23

Still relied on in draft heads ¶ 12
An illustration, not a screenshot. One fact in a fictional matter, carrying four recorded stances from three different moments — which is why a contradiction is a query over the record rather than a judgement somebody has to remember to make.

The only way anything is written

Accept, edit or dismiss

Every inference arrives as a card to accept, edit or dismiss, and that card is the only way anything reaches the file. It carries what it proposes, how confident it is, and where it came from — the utterance, the moment, the paragraph.

What was proposed, what you did with it and when is in the audit trail, which is a professional protection before it is a feature. Dismissed proposals never touch the record, and an edit keeps both what was proposed and what you made of it.

It is the trust mechanism and the primary input method at once. There are no forms anywhere else.

Proposed fact · confident

Delivery of the invoices was effected on 2 August 2020.

Attaches to — issue 1 · prescription

From — van Wyk SC, 10:39:12 · founding affidavit ¶ 44, p 17

Accept · edit · dismiss
An illustration, not a screenshot. The proposal card in a fictional matter, carrying the fact, the issue it attaches to, and both places it was drawn from. Until it is accepted, none of it is in the file.

See it against a matter you already know

Half an hour, your own papers, and one hearing you have already had. If it does not find something you missed, we have not earned the next conversation.